The 2009 Toyota Tundra is essentially the same truck that made waves three years ago when it arrived on the scene as the first full-range, top-to-bottom overseas threat to the domestic truckmakers. With its robust chassis, wide range of body styles, available 381-horsepower V8, pleasant driving demeanor and distinctive interior, the Tundra set itself apart from the pack. The recently redesigned GM pickups were certainly viable challengers, but after living with both a Tundra and a Silverado in our long-term fleet over the past year, we ultimately determined that the Toyota was the better buy.

What a difference a year makes, or rather, what a difference two redesigned competitors make. After ruling the roost for its first couple years of production, the 2009 Toyota Tundra must now contend with the redesigned trucks from Dodge and Ford. Despite this onslaught, the Tundra sticks to its still-mighty guns for 2009, adding only a pair of limited-edition sport and off-road packages. The lineup of three stout engines, three bed lengths and three cab styles remains the same. Notably, the Tundra forgoes a traditional extended cab in favor of two crew-cab flavors: regular Double Cab and jumbo CrewMax. Now that Dodge’s Mega Cab is discontinued, no other truck comes close to matching the Tundra CrewMax’s rear-seat space.

During our long-term test of a Tundra Double Cab, it proved to be a capable workhorse that tackled all our towing, hauling and commuting needs without breaking a sweat. Its strapping 5.7-liter V8 and responsive six-speed automatic consistently impressed, and although the cabin evinced a few ergonomic missteps, it was generally durable, spacious and comfy. On the downside, the Tundra’s wide haunches and expansive dashboard make it seem larger than some competitors from behind the wheel. Also, its rear suspension provides a significantly bouncier ride than the sophisticated coil-spring setup found in the new Dodge Ram.

The full-size-pickup segment is an embarrassment of riches these days. The new trucks from Dodge and Ford are impressive, but so are the GM full-sizers. In our most recent full-size truck comparison test, the Tundra was narrowed edged out of first place by the Ram. Nonetheless, the 2009 Toyota Tundra remains a well-built and thoroughly competent truck. Make sure it’s on your to-drive list if you’re shopping for one of these beasts of burden. for make payment use payday loan

With a keen awareness of the growing consumer desire for more fuel-efficient vehicles, for 2009 Chevrolet offers an XFE (Xtra Fuel Economy) model, a two-mode hybrid, and now a six-speed transmission with manual shifting capabilities. The new Hydra-Matic 6L80 is available in Silverados equipped with the 5.3-, 6.0-, and 6.2-liter engines. It was first made available in crew-cab models and later will be offered in regular- and extended-cab models (except with the five-foot-eight-inch short bed) with 5.3- and 6.0-liter V-8s. The new transmission provides a lower rpm at cruising speed, improving fuel economy on the highway.

What better way to find out just how much of a difference the improvements have made than with a road trip? We requested an LT Crew Cab with the Z71 off-road package, 18-inch wheels with Bridgestone Dueler A/Ts, the 5.3-liter, E85-capable V-8 with 315 horsepower and 338 pound-feet of torque and Active Fuel Management, and the aforementioned optional six-speed automatic.

Leaving sunny Los Angeles, we were ready for a nearly 1400-mile journey to Northern California and the Sierra Nevadas and back. Once out of the metropolis, the trip consisted of mostly freeway driving, with some in-city travel, snow driving, and a windy canyon road thrown in for good measure.

The brawny, squared-off sheetmetal and wide stance can be unnerving at first in city traffic, but the Silverado’s excellent sightlines make its size easy to adapt to. Quick, accurate steering inspires confidence, and a smooth ride makes the Silverado a pleasant commuter. The LT came with a nicely appointed interior, albeit not the topline package found in the LTZ. Still, the seats remained comfortable despite the distance, and the XM Satellite Radio and auxiliary input jack kept us entertained for the duration of the trip. The center stack is still a ho-hum slab of gray plastic when the Navigation box hasn’t been checked on the order sheet, but the stereo and small upper glovebox–which requires two hands to open–were the only detractors from the otherwise nicely finished dash.

Because inclement weather was predicted, we unfortunately had to load the luggage in the cab rather than in the bed. However, the 60/40-split rear seat bottoms are easy to raise using one hand, which allowed us to stow the luggage on the cab floor. Folding the larger portion of the seat gave us a week’s worth of gear-stowing for three people behind the driver’s seat and still ample seating for a third passenger in the second row.

On the road, the Silverado was exceptionally pleasant to drive, providing a smooth ride–the suspension ably soaked up bumps and pavement imperfections. The steering was nicely weighted and communicative, and the manual-shift buttons on the column came in handy on long hills or when passing. Climbing up the narrow, windy Feather River Canyon, the Silverado handled nicely, never feeling underpowered or too wide for the road.

When the snow came, the Silverado remained unfazed. The Automatic four-wheel-drive setting handled slippery roads nicely, and putting it in 4-Hi four-wheel drive kept us trouble-free with deeper snow. Not once did the truck feel unsure or disconnected from the road.

Upon our return to Los Angeles, we had traveled 1364 miles (including a marathon 13-hour drive covering most of the length of California), from sea level to nearly 4000 feet and back. Along the way, we spent $148.71 on 79 gallons of regular-grade gas, averaging 21.7 gallons per fill-up at about $40 every 380 or so miles.

General Motors’ focus on four brands – Buick,Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC – indicates for the near term that light-duty trucks and SUVs will continue to be a part of the product mix, with new SUVs in the form of a Cadillac SRX crossover, Chevy Equinox compact SUV, and the GMC Terrain compact SUV among six new models announced for 2010.

While touting leading-edge design, technology, engineering excellence and quality in their ‘re:invention’ strategy, GM might see a glimmer of hope in a recent survey from J.D. Power & Associates, entitled “Automotive Emerging Technologies Study”, released this month. The study, which is designed to measure familiarity, interest and purchase intent for emerging automotive technologies, polls consumers before and after an estimated market price is revealed. For example, in the survey, 67% of the 19,249 respondents indicated that onboard navigation systems to guide them to the nearest Starbucks or other destinations were of interest.When the cost of a factory-installed navigation system was revealed at $1,600, interest dropped to 20% overall, while 45% of those who owned premium vehicles still chose the factory onboard systems versus lower cost off-board systems.

Mike Marshall, J.D. Power director of emerging technologies said, “Although the factory-installed options are considerably more expensive than an off-board navigation system, the price difference is not reflected in a proportionate decrease in consumer interest levels. Among consumers who express interest in both types of navigation system, seven out of ten indicate they would choose a factory-installed navigation system rather than an off-board version—despite the cost premium.”Other technologies fared about as well, and among consumers who listen to their portable digital music player in their vehicle, more than one-half use an auxiliary input jack, while approximately 20% use a wireless FM transmitter. Nearly 2/3s of consumers indicate that they would like the ability to listen to a portable digital music player through their vehicle’s speakers, while 27% express a desire to use a smartphone’s music capabilities in conjunction with their vehicle’s audio system.

Among consumers currently utilizing their vehicle’s Bluetooth functionality, initial interest for wireless connectivity in their next vehicle is 68%, compared with just 47% among those who have the feature but do not use it in their vehicle.Premium surround sound systems garner the highest interest rate among near-term vehicle intenders at 72%, while just 61% of consumers who plan on purchasing a new vehicle in two years or more indicate interest in this feature. “Consumers nearing the final phase of the vehicle purchase process are often more well-versed on vehicle options and features than those in the early stages of shopping, and likely have recently researched the available vehicle specifications,” stated Marshall, who added, “The increased familiarity of the possible benefits and conveniences of these technologies may lead to an increase in interest.”

How this bodes for an industry accustomed to making their profit on all the bells and whistles, and GM in particular with a plethora of trim levels and options, remains to be seen. In addition, how does the automotive aftermarket deal with consumers who are increasingly more interested in having the OEMs integrate these entertainment and connectivity technologies into the new vehicles? Time will certainly tell – but that’s oneluxury automakers don’t have, and a gamble they can’t afford to take.